APPENDICES
Appendix A:



|
Appendix B:
Industrial Sources of Mercury and Applicable Mercury-Specific
Regulations
|
|
Source |
# Fac.
In Gl* |
Origin/uses
Of Mercury |
Air Releases ** |
Water
Discharges
*** |
Waste
Management
**** |
Comments |
|
MERCURY PRODUCTION |
|
Primary Hg Production |
|
Hg no longer produced from Hg ore; primary Hg recovered as
by-product from gold ores. |
NESHAPS: Hg air emissions shall not exceed 2300 grams
Hg/24hrs for mercury ore processing facilities (40CFR61.52) |
Hg effluent limits for primary precious metals and Hg
subcategory (40CFR 421.250) and mercury ore subcategory (40CFR440.40) |
Solid wastes from extraction, benificiation, and
processing of ores exempt from RCRA hazardous waste regulations under
Bevill amendment. |
Mining facilities do not report chemical releases under
TRI. |
|
Secondary Hg Production |
PA--2 IL--1 NY--1 |
Recycling/recovery of Hg containing products (e.g. dental
amalgams, batteries); industrial waste and scrap (e.g. instrument and
electrical manufacturing, waste, sludges from research labs).
|
Designated major source category of HAP emissions (CAA'112(c)). |
Hg effluent limits for secondary Hg subcategory
(40CFR421.200)--NSPS, PSNS based on amount of Hg produced or processed. |
|
In-house Hg reclamation also occurs at industrial plants.
MN: drafting management standards for facilities recycling
hazardous wastes. Hg refining plants in NY, PA, IL. MN also has three lamp
recycling facilities. |
|
Key:
Hg - Mercury,
CAA - Clean Air Act,
NESHAPS - National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants,
BIF - boilers and industrial furnaces,
TRI - Toxic Release Inventory,
MSW - municipal solid waste,
HAP - hazardous air pollutant,
MACT - maximum achievable control technology |
|
Note: This table shows the significant sources of Hg
releases by source category, and how those releases are currently
regulated. Appendix A includes five categories of mercury sources: (1)
Mercury Production, (2) Use as a Manufacturing Input, (3) Waste Disposal,
(4) Release as a By-Product of Manufacturing, (5) Release as a By-Product
of Electrical Generation. An asterisk (*) indicates that additional
information appears on the last page. |
|
Hg compound production |
NY--3
OH--1
PA--1 |
Hg compounds include mercuric oxide, mercuric chloride,
mercuric & mercurous sulfate, mercurous nitrate, organic Hg salt,
thimersol |
|
|
|
Many mercury compounds are imported. |
|
Source |
# Fac.
In Gl* |
Origin/uses
Of Mercury |
Air Releases ** |
Water
Discharges *** |
Waste
Management**** |
Comments |
|
MERCURY USE IN MANUFACTURING***** |
|
Chemical And Allied Products |
|
Chlorine/Caustic Soda Manufacture
(mercury cell chlor-alkali process) |
WI--1 OH--1 |
Used as a catalyst in mercury cell process at chlor-alkali
plants, which manufacture chlorine and sodium hydroxide. Hg cell process
accounted for 14% of 1992 US chlorine production. |
Hg emissions cannot exceed 2300g /24hrs; prescribed stack
sampling methods required, and approved practices to meet specified
ventilation emissions. (CAA (40CFR61, NESHAPS)) |
Existing Sources: BAT, BPT Hg effluent limits New Sources:
NSPS, PSNS
No pretreatment standards for existing sources using
mercury cell process (40CFR415.60) |
Industry Specific: K071 and K106 are chlor-alkali wastes
listed specifically for Hg. Land disposal restrictions for chlor-alkali
process wastes effective May 1993 |
Largest single use of Hg in US
Impact of land disposal restrictions: some facilities are
building mercury recovery plants; others are shipping wastes to Canada
Many Hg cell plants have changed to diaphragm cell process |
|
Laboratory Uses |
|
Used in instruments as reagent, catalyst, indicator, and
for calibration, sealing, and radioactive diagnosis |
|
No restriction --POTWs may develop public education
campaigns for labs |
|
Use declined from 32 metric tons in 1990 to 10 metric tons
in 1991. |
|
Paint |
|
Mercury compounds used to control microbial growth in
latex paint cans; prevent mildew growth on painted surfaces; anti-fouling
agent in maritime paint |
|
|
P092 - Phenylmercuric acetate (Hg compound used in paints)
is an acute RCRA waste |
$ All
registrations for mercury biocides used in paint banned or voluntarily
canceled by registrant
$ Hg in paints
expected to continue declining as existing supplies depleted. Paint on
buildings is demolition waste (not RCRA) |
|
Other Chemical and
Allied Products |
|
(see Table 5 and Appendix B for mercury- containing
products.) |
|
Chemical And Allied Products |
|
Pesticides |
|
Mercury compounds used as pesticides, biocides, fungicides |
|
Process wastewater from manufacture of metallo-organic
pesticides w/active ingredient containing Hg prohibited, subject to
variances approved by EPA (40CFR455.30) |
|
Voluntary cancellation of last two mercury-containing
fungicides announced in November 1993 |
|
Electrical And Electronic Uses |
|
Electric Lamps |
|
Use: electrical conductor Hg emitted when lamps break
Products: High intensity lamps: mercury vapor
lamps (used in motion picture production, photography, heat therapy);
metal halide lamps; high pressure sodium lamps; incandescent lamp
filaments, fluorescent lights |
|
Waste streams from fluorescent bulb manufacturing
exempted from pretreatment regulations (for all chemicals) |
Hg levels in some products meet RCRA or state
hazardous waste definition and require special management
and disposal |
Second largest source of mercury in MSW
Fluorescent bulbs are promoted for energy conservation,
but considered hazardous waste due to Hg levels; In
1999, EPA included mercury-containing lamps the in universal waste
rule.
MN has three lamp
recycling facilities. |
|
Wiring Devices & Switches |
|
Hg encased in metal is used as conductor to close
electrical circuit
Products:
thermostats, Hg cells in smoke detectors,
mercury arc rectifiers, silent switches, tilt switches,
relays, cathode tubes used for radios, radar, & telecommunications
equipment, electric toys |
|
No pretreatment limits for switchgear wastestreams
(for any chemicals) |
|
Components found in a wide variety of equipment
with electrical parts (e.g. white goods)
These are considered hazardous wastes under RCRA. |
|
Battery
Manufacturing |
|
(1) Used as anode or electrolyte to prevent corrosion
and hydrogen release; extends shelf-life; improves performance
in extreme temperatures. Products: alkaline batteries. (2)
used as cathode in Hg oxide batteries.
Products:
mercuric oxide (Hg zinc) button batteries,
silver oxide, zinc-air, carbon zinc batteries, mercuric
oxide cannister batteries. Hg leaches from corrosion in
landfill; volatilizes during combustion |
|
Hg effluent limitations for LeClanche subcategory
(zinc anode batteries w/acid electrolyte) (40CFR461.40); NSPS,
PSNS, PSES based on mg/kg cell produced for specified
operations only; no discharge allowed from nonspecified
operations
Hg effluent limits for zinc subcategory (40CFR461.70)
- BPT, BAT, NSPS, PSES, PSNS specified for various
processes |
|
Batteries are largest source of Hg in MSW
incinerators.
In 1996, Congress passed the Mercury-Containing and
Rechargeable Battery Management Act which phases out the use of mercury in
batteries sold in the U.S. The sole exception are button-cell batteries
whose mercury content is limited.
|
|
Instruments And Related Products |
|
Measuring & Control Instruments |
|
Use: Hg used to measure or control reactions
and equipment functions;
Products: thermometers (primary use),
pressure sensing devices (barometers, manometers), navigational
equipment, seals, valves; medical/ scientific instruments:
Hg emissions occur during cleaning and refilling, and from
instruments in municipal solid waste |
None |
None |
|
Digital thermometers are replacing Hg thermometers.
Hg thermometers banned in Sweden.
MN has special management and disposal restrictions
on thermostats. |
|
Dental Equipment & Supplies |
|
Uses: forms alloys; chemically binds compounds
together to form stable restorative material (amalgam is an
alloy) Products: dental amalgam -- fillings for teeth,
other dental equipment and supplies. |
None |
No specific pretreatment regulations --POTWs may
develop education programs for dental offices |
|
Dental amalgams may be a major source of elemental
mercury vapor exposure to the general population. Dental amalgam
in waste water contributes to POTW Hg levels; may contribute
to mercury emissions in crematories. |
|
NOTE: For product-specific information, please see
Appendix B. Mercury has several thousand applications. Not all products
and uses are specifically listed. |
|
Source |
# Fac.
In Gl* |
Origin/uses
Of Mercury |
Air Releases ** |
Water
Discharges *** |
Waste
Management**** |
Comments |
|
PRODUCT DISPOSAL - INCINERATION AND LAND DISPOSAL |
|
Municipal Waste Incineration
(under CAA,
fuel feed stream must be >30% municipal waste) |
|
Hg is present in solid waste (batteries, electric lighting,
etc.) - Hg emitted when waste is burned at high temperatures. |
EPA has established MACT standards for major stationary
sources. Rule compliance date is 12/2000.
MN - proposed waste combustion rules including emissions
limits; new incinerator permits with Hg limits will require
air monitoring systems and periodic stack testing. |
N/A |
MSW ash is considered hazardous waste if it
exceeds RCRA toxicity levels. Supreme Court decision (Chicago
v. EDF, March 1994) |
Municipal solid waste includes waste generated from
residential, commercial, and institutional sources; equipment installed to
trap fly ash and acid rain gases do not control Hg emissions
MN: Hg must be removed from products before disposal.
OH: Considering installing Hg emission control equipment and
separating Hg containing products; IL: Incinerator technology based
on consideration of specific pollutants. |
|
Commercial/ Industrial Waste Incinerators |
|
Hg present in wastes: batteries, lighting, etc. |
EPA will issue proposed rules by 12/2000, and final rules
by 12/2001 in accordance with CAA'129(a)(4). |
N/A |
|
|
|
Sewage Sludge Driers & Incinerators |
NY--33
PA--21
MI--19 |
Hg in sludge from wastewater treatment plants. |
CAA - Hg emissions limit = 3200g/24hrs; annual monitoring
and reporting if Hg emissions exceed 1600 g/24hrs;
prescribed emissions testing procedure or procedures for
sludge to demonstrate compliance (40CFR61.52, NESHAPS);
Listed as source category for HAP emissions limits (CAA '112(c)(1)) |
(see wastewater treatment) |
|
EPA is considering a revised rule. |
|
Wastewater Treatment |
|
Hg present in wastewater entering facility |
No existing standards; not listed as category of HAP sources. |
Mercury is eligible for removal credits - POTWs may
request removal credits against facility pretreatment
limits, as long as POTW meets sludge concentration limits |
Sludges for land application or surface disposal
must meet specific concentration requirements for agricultural
land, forest land, public contact sites, home garden application
or landfills
Hg concentration limits in sludge: 57 mg/kg
limit for land application of sludge (40CFR503) |
EPA will conduct studies to characterize HAP emissions from
industries discharging to POTWs
Hazardous waste incinerators may test Hg content in
sludge in lieu of emissions testing requirements.
Western Lake Superior Sanitary District (WLSSD) in
Duluth, MN has active pollution prevention program
MI - POTWs must have waste minimization plans |
|
Hazardous Waste Incinerators |
IL--1 |
|
No uniform emissions standards; Hg limits depend on
individual permits; facilities shielded from regulatory
changes until permit expires (CFR 264.344)
Waste analysis required to determine Hg concentrations
unless incinerator has documentation of no Hg presence
(40CFR265.341)
Rule expected in 1999. |
|
Residues must meet LDR specifications |
EPA is revising draft hazardous waste combustion
rules based on MACT standards
Cement kilns also burn hazardous waste |
|
Medical Waste Incinerators |
|
Hg in wastes generated from hospitals, clinics, labs,
etc. |
In 1997, EPA set mercury emissions limits based on MACT
standards for new and exisiting facilities. Rule Comply date is 9/2002..
WI - incinerators with capacity >5 tons/day must
be tested for Hg during first 90 day period and following year |
|
|
|
|
Landfills |
|
Mercury in products in the municipal waste stream,
especially those subject to breakage such as thermostats, thermometers,
and fluorescent lamps. |
Under CAA ('112(d))
EPA will issue mercury emission standards for municipal solid waste
landfills by 11/2000. Regulations will be based on MACT standards. |
Monitor for Hg in groundwater; leachate testing
requirements |
Subtitle D (non-hazardous) landfills: leachate cannot
exceed 0.2mg/l Hg;
Subtitle C (hazardous waste) landfills: disposal
prohibited unless waste undergoes prescribed treatment
to reduce Hg to regulated levels
Determine Hg concentrations if food chain
crops are grown - Hg cannot be transferred to food chain
portion of crop |
MN - studying Hg content of landfill gas and leachate. IL
- Hg components must be removed from discarded white goods
(e.g. appliances) before disposal
MN: Hg must be removed from products before disposal. |
|
Ash disposal facilities |
|
Mercury in incinerator ash |
permit specific |
|
|
|
|
Auto salvage/ scrap yards |
|
Automobile components have Hg, some automobiles
used for illegal disposal; Hg released from crushing switches |
|
|
MN monitors mercury levels |
MN: developing best management practices for yard
operators |
|
Crematories |
|
Hg in dental fillings volatilizes during cremation
|
Crematorium and pathological unit rules will be proposed
11/1999, as required by CAA '129. |
|
|
|
|
Hospitals, Dentists |
|
Mercury in waste streams (water and solid waste) |
|
No pretreatment regs |
|
IL: P5
Bureau gives guidance on Hg disposal
MN: WLSSD has a brochure for dentists
OH: Community volunteer efforts address Hg in waste |
|
Source |
# Fac.
In Gl* |
Origin/uses
Of Mercury |
Air Releases ** |
Water
Discharges *** |
Waste
Management**** |
Comments |
|
MERCURY AS A BY-PRODUCT OF MANUFACTURING PROCESSES |
|
Carbon Black Production |
MI--1
OH--1 |
Hg present in oil feedstock |
|
No Hg limits; but discharge of process waste water
prohibited except to POTWs. 40CFR458 |
|
|
|
Coke Production |
IL--3
IN--3
MI--1
NY--1
OH--3, PA--3 |
Hg is By-product present in coal used as feedstock
for coke oven batteries (primary feedstock for iron and coal
industry) |
|
|
|
|
|
Petroleum Refining |
|
Hg present in petroleum crude |
|
No specific Hg limits. |
|
|
|
Lime Manufacturing |
IL--1
OH--1
PA--1 |
Hg present as impurity in processed stone and from
fuel used to heat kilns |
|
|
|
|
|
Portland Cement Manufacturing |
|
Hg present in ore and minerals used as raw materials;
Hg in fossil fuels used in cement kilns |
EPA issues proposed rules in 3/98.
Feed rate screening limits for mercury specified under interim
standards for burners or industrial furnaces (40CFR266.103 and
266.106) |
|
|
Cement kiln dust exempt from RCRA hazardous waste definition.
Cement industry is increasing its use of municipal,
industrial, and hazardous wastes for kiln firing to replace
fossil fuel use (for energy conservation); EPA is revising
draft hazardous waste combustion rules |
|
Phosphate-based fertilizer factories |
|
Hg is trace element in rock phosphate |
|
|
|
|
|
Primary Smelting & Refining of Copper |
MI--1 |
Copper recovered from sulfide ore that contains Hg |
|
Hg effluent limits for copper, lead, zinc, gold, silver
ores subcategory (40 CFR 440.100) |
|
Residues exempted from RCRA under Bevill exclusion |
|
Primary Smelting & Refining of Nonferrous Metals,
Except Copper & Aluminum |
|
Hg present in almost all minerals; lead recovered from
sulfide ore that contains Hg; zinc smelting process generates
Hg emissions |
No existing regulations for mercury
Many mining facilities are listed as source categories
for HAPS |
Hg effluent limitations for: primary antimony subcategory
(nonferrous metals category). (40CFR421.140); copper, lead,
zinc, gold, silver, and molymbdnenum ores (40CFR440.100),
and platinum ores subcategory (440.110) |
|
Residues exempted from RCRA under Bevill exclusion |
|
Source |
# Fac.
In Gl* |
Origin/uses
Of Mercury |
Air Releases ** |
Water
Discharges *** |
Waste
Management**** |
Comments |
|
MERCURY RELEASED AS A BY-PRODUCT IN POWER GENERATION AND
HEATING |
|
Electric Power Generation (Utility Boilers) |
|
Hg present in coal, oil, natural gas, or wood used in
electric utility steam generating units - emitted as trace contaminant
when volatilized at high temperatures. |
No current Hg emissions limits under CAA. CAA 112(n)(1)(A)
Utility Study Report to Congress (1998) analyzed the public health hazards
from utilities; EPA may promulgate regulations based on study results;
utilities exempted from list of sources accounting for 90% of Hg emissions
that will require MACT standards ('112(c)(6) |
No detectable Hg allowed in discharge |
Residues exempt from RCRA under Bevill exclusion |
Coal has highest Hg content of fossil fuels. 80% of energy
consumption in utility boilers is from coal combustion; 95% of coal is
bituminous and subbituminous coal. |
|
Commercial & Industrial Boilers |
|
Hg present in fuels |
EPA will issue proposed rules 12/2000, and final rules
12/2001. |
|
|
|
|
Residential Boilers and Wood Stoves |
|
Hg present in fuels |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Notes: |
Source categories used to identify manufacturing uses of
mercury follow Bureau of Mines categories, which track U.S. industrial
consumption of refined Hg metal.
Mercury releases to air, water and land are reported by
manufacturing firms that meet TRI threshold requirements. Manufacturing
facilities (SIC codes 20-39) that have 10 or more full time employees and
manufacture/process 25,000 pounds of a listed chemical or otherwise use
10,000 pounds of a listed chemical must report chemical release
information in TRI. |
|
* |
"# FAC. IN GL" =
number of facilities in Great Lakes States.
Source: National Emissions Inventory of Mercury and Mercury Compounds:
Interim Final Report, USEPA, 12/93. |
|
** |
Air emissions: EPA
must list source categories that account for 90% of aggregate Hg emissions
by 1995, excluding electric utilities. Sources will be subject to MACT
standards within 10 years ('112(c)(6)).
EPA has also published a list of major categories and subcategories of
sources that emit hazardous air pollutants (including mercury and
compounds). Any stationary source emitting more than 10 tons per year of a
listed substance or 25 tons per year of any combination of substances will
be subject to MACT standards. Major air toxics emitters will require
permits. |
|
*** |
Water discharge: BAT=best
available control technology, BPT=best practicable control technology,
NSPS=new source performance standards, PSNS=pretreatment standards for new
sources, PSES=pretreatment standards for existing sources. States may
impose more stringent permit limits to meet water quality standards for
mercury (standards vary by state). Facilities must notify POTW of
hazardous substances discharged which are not covered by pretreatment
standards. |
|
**** |
Waste management:
Mercury is a listed and characteristic waste under RCRA. Any source listed
here may be generating D009, the RCRA hazardous waste code that identifies
wastes characteristic for mercury. Other RCRA waste codes that identify
mercury include U151 (mercury), K071 and K106 (listed for mercury) , F039
(listed for multiple sources), P065 and P092 (mercury compounds). All
mercury-containing wastes have land disposal restrictions. Specified
treatment for mercury-containing wastes is incineration or thermal
processing (40CFR 268.42). |
|
Appendix C:
Regulations on Products that Contain Mercury
Note: This table highlights regulations that affect the
most common mercury-containing products. It is not a comprehensive list of
all products that may contain mercury.
The "Comments" section includes general
information that expands on the regulatory information. |
|
Product/Use |
Role of Mercury |
Regulations/Programs on Mercury
Products |
Fed/State Regulation |
Comments |
|
Chemical and Allied Products |
|
|
|
Agricultural Products |
Mercury compounds used as pesticides, bactericides,
disinfectants, fungicide |
Restricted and/or banned under FIFRA |
Federal |
|
|
Turf Products |
Pesticide |
Calo-chlor and calo-gran, the last mercury-based
pesticides registered for use in U.S. voluntarily canceled by manufacturer
(Grace Sierra Crop Protection) in November 1993 |
Federal |
Approximately 21,000 pounds used annually on golf course
turf and greens to control fungi Pink Snow Mold and Grey Snow Mold;
manufacturer may sell and distribute products labeled for release or
shipment before 6/93 until 6/94: retailers may sell products until stocks
exhausted; users may use products until stocks depleted. |
|
Fungicide |
Prohibits use of mercury in fungicides |
MN |
|
|
Paint |
Mercury compounds used as biocide to control microbial
growth in paint cans and prevent mildew on painted surfaces |
Registrations for mercury compounds in indoor and outdoor
latex paint banned or canceled (1990, 1991) |
Federal |
Manufacturers may use up existing stocks
Cancellation of biocide registrations has reduced Hg
consumption in paint, and paint residue in municipal solid waste; paint
cans w/mercury residue are still discarded |
| |
Anti-fouling paints for marine use banned in 1972 |
Federal |
|
| |
No Hg deliberately introduced into paint intended for use
in MN (except in art supplies) |
MN |
|
|
Pigment, Dyes |
Coloring (maroon, red, orange) primarily for plastics |
Cadmium-mercury pigments no longer manufactured in U.S.
(domestic production ceased in 1988); may still be imported |
Federal |
Many states have laws that phase out metals in pigments |
| |
No Hg deliberately introduced into pigments and dyes
intended for use in MN (except in art supplies) |
MN |
|
|
Cosmetics |
Preservative, antimicrobial |
Limited to eye area cosmetics or ointments with
concentration <65 ppm (21CFR700.13) |
Federal |
|
|
Pharmaceuticals |
Used in antiseptics, ointments, diuretics |
Misbranded drug laws - list quantity of mercury in product |
IL, IN, NY, OH, PA |
|
| |
Yellow mercuric oxide is not generally recognized as safe
and effective, or is misbranded for over the counter use |
Federal |
|
|
Poisons |
|
Restrictions on sale of mercury and mercury compounds |
OH |
|
|
|
Levels established for Hg products to be considered
poisons |
PA |
|
|
Catalysts |
Hg used as catalysts for production of vinyl chloride
monomers and urethane foams, as well as other products |
|
|
|
Packaging |
|
Restrictions on merc contains intentionally introduced Hg
content in packaging and packaging components; no products may be sold in
packaging that contains intentionally introduced mercury. |
FL, IL, MN, NJ, NY, WI |
Implementation dates vary by state, and include general
exceptions if no feasible alternatives exist; Pennsylvania is considering
bill to regulate toxic materials in packaging |
|
Special Paper Coatings |
Mercury bromide and mercury acetic acid used in
specialized paper and film with cathode ray tubes |
|
|
Manufacturers plan to phase out use of mercury in coating |
|
Explosives |
Mercury fulminate is detonator |
Explosives containing mercury are Class A, maximum hazards |
MN, WI |
In the last 20 years, only the military has used mercury
explosives |
|
Fireworks |
Catalyst/explosive |
Permits required for fireworks with mercury |
MN |
|
| |
Fireworks containing mercury are prohibited. |
MI, NJ |
|
|
Livestock and Poultry Remedies |
|
List percentage of mercury on remedy |
MI |
|
|
Product/Use |
Role of Mercury |
Regulations/Programs on Mercury
Products |
Fed/State Regulation |
Comments |
|
Electrical and Electronic Uses |
|
|
|
Electric Lighting |
|
|
Electric lighting products are second largest component of
municipal solid waste (after batteries) |
|
Fluorescent Lamps
(low pressure) |
Mercury vapor fluoresces at UV wavelength |
Encouraged as replacement for incandescent bulbs for
energy conservation (see 10CFR450.31 - energy conservation measures).
Included in the Universal Waste Rule. |
Federal |
Fluorescent lights are largest component of electric
lighting discards in municipal solid waste; used bulbs considered
hazardous waste because high levels of mercury exceed RCRA toxicity |
| |
Lamps in state-owned buildings must be recycled. |
MN |
characteristic limit (.2 mg/l in leachate) |
|
|
Viewed as by-product that can be recycled, and exempt from
RCRA |
OH |
|
| |
Lamps sold to managers of industrial, commercial, office,
or multi-unit buildings must be labeled; building contractors must specify
mercury management plans for removed lamps |
MN |
|
| |
Lamps containing mercury must be labeled. |
VT |
|
|
Mercury Vapor Lamps
|
Facilitates light production by electric arc |
Encouraged for energy conservation (see 10CFR450.31 -
energy conservation measures) Included in the Universal Waste Rule. |
Federal |
|
| |
Lamps must be self-extinguishing or have protective
shield; efficiency standards in public areas (theaters, gyms) |
NY |
|
| |
Mercury must be removed before disposal; lamp sellers and
contractors responsible for public education about mercury management
requirements; limits on production and distribution of lamps |
MN |
|
|
|
Lamps containing mercury must be labeled. |
VT |
|
|
High Intensity Lamps
|
|
Included in the Universal Waste Rule. |
Federal |
|
| |
Lamps sold to managers of industrial, commercial, offices,
or multi-unit buildings must be labeled; building contractors must specify
mercury management plans for removed lamps |
MN |
Used for outdoor lighting; mercury lamps are more
efficient and brighter than other outdoor lights |
|
|
Lamps containing mercury must be labeled. |
VT |
|
|
Metal Halide Lamps |
|
Included in the Universal Waste Rule. |
Federal |
Encouraged for energy conservation (see 10CFR450.31-
energy conservation measures) |
| |
Lamps containing mercury must be labeled. |
VT |
|
|
Incandescent Lamp Filaments |
Hg used as continuous electrical contact in tungsten bar
sintering |
Included in the Universal Waste Rule. |
Federal |
|
| |
Lamps containing mercury must be labeled. |
VT |
|
|
Product/Use |
Role of Mercury |
Regulations/Programs on Mercury
Products |
Fed/State Regulation |
Comments |
|
Wiring Devices and Switches |
|
|
|
Thermostats |
Temperature measurement |
Mercury must be removed for recycling or recovery before
disposal; manufacturers must provide information and incentives to ensure
recycling or proper management; heating, ventilating and air-conditioning
(HVAC) dealers required to properly manage or recycle used mercury
thermostats (MN St 115A.93, 115A.9561, 115.932) |
MN |
Digital thermostats are replacing mercury thermostats;
long lag time before old Hg thermostats discarded |
|
|
Products containing Hg must be labeled, including disposal
restrictions |
MN |
MN has pilot program for HVAC dealers to recycle mercury
containing thermostats by returning them to HVAC wholesaler who, in turn,
returns them to Honeywell for recycling/reclaiming |
|
White Goods |
Mercury components (e.g., switches) may be included in
large appliances (e.g., refrigerators, air conditioners, etc.) |
Mercury components must be removed prior to disposal |
MN, IL |
|
| |
Hg in repaired or replaced items must be reused or
recycled |
MN |
|
|
Toys |
|
Ban on toys with Hg; fines imposed for retail sales |
MN, WI |
|
|
Electric Wall Switches |
|
Products containing Hg must be labeled, including disposal
restrictions |
MN |
|
|
Electrical Components |
May be included in any electrical machinery (e.g., mining,
automotive, and industrial equipment, smoke detectors, etc.) |
Limits on mercury use in mining equipment |
PA |
|
| |
Products containing mercury must be labeled, including
disposal restrictions |
MN |
|
|
Product/Use |
Role of Mercury |
Regulations/Programs on Mercury
Products |
Fed/State Regulation |
Comments |
|
Batteries |
|
|
|
|
|
General Mercury Containing Batteries |
|
Batteries included in universal waste rule to ease RCRA
restrictions on hazardous waste management and divert waste from MSW
landfills; states may set up special collection programs not subject to
storage, transportation, and permitting requirements of RCRA 1996 Battery
Management Act bans all mercury-containing batteries in the U.S., except
for button-cells batteries. |
Federal |
Batteries were largest source of Hg in municipal solid
waste. Many states have banned mercury in batteries; manufacturers have
reduced mercury use by over 90% since 1988.
EPA is requesting comments on labeling batteries to aid in
collection, sorting, and recycling; denied a petition filed under 'TSCA
to require deposit on mercury-containing batteries. |
| |
Deposit/refund system will begin in 1998: purchasers
return used mercury batteries to retailer or approved collection facility |
MI |
|
| |
Task force on storage, transport, disposal, recycling |
IL |
Industry groups have developed uniform voluntary industry
labeling standards for lead and cadmium batteries |
|
Alkaline Batteries
|
Prevents corrosion and hydrogen release, extends shelf
life; improves performance over temperature range (batteries used in
flashlights, radios, and other electronics) |
Hg concentrations <.025% by weight |
MN, NY |
Battery manufacturers have eliminated mercury in alkaline
batteries, except button cells and reusable batteries. |
|
|
Hg banned in alkaline batteries in 1996 |
MN, WI |
|
|
|
|
MN |
|
|
Mercuric Oxide Batteries (also button cell, mercury-zinc
button cell) |
Mercury used as cathode material and is integral component
(button cell batteries contain ~40% mercury) |
Sale of dry cell batteries with mercuric oxide, electrode
batteries prohibited without exemption; button cell nonrechargeable
batteries restricted to <25mg Hg; labeling requirements; disposal
prohibited; manufacturers responsible for collection system |
MN |
Primarily used in hearing aids; also used in calculators,
watches, cameras, photographic equipment, electronic games,
health/hospital equipment, airplane underwater locator beacons |
| |
Hg content of alkaline button cell batteries must be
<25 mg by weight |
NY |
NY is exploring recycling options for these batteries |
| |
|
|
Some mercuric oxide cells used in military and medical
operations (e.g., night vision devices, EKG machines, etc.) are disposed
of as hazardous waste. Proposed federal legislation may ban mercuric oxide
batteries. |
|
Carbon Zinc (LeClanche) |
Contain ~1% Hg; Hg controls chemical reactions between
zinc and other battery components |
Sale prohibited if Hg concentration >1ppm |
NY |
Carbon zinc cells have shorter life than alkaline
batteries. Mercury is no longer used in certain zinc battery products. |
| |
Sale of batteries with Hg banned after 1994 |
WI |
|
|
Zinc Air |
Hg content ~ 1% |
Button cells restricted to <25 mg mercury, labeling |
MN |
Used in pagers, hearing aids |
|
Product/Use |
Role of Mercury |
Regulations/Programs on Mercury
Products |
Fed/State Regulation |
Comments |
|
Instruments and Related Products |
|
|
|
Measure and Control Instruments |
|
|
|
Thermometers |
Elemental mercury indicates temperature |
Limits on distribution of Hg thermometers; mercury must be
removed before disposal; no routine distribution of Hg thermometers by
medical facilities |
MN |
Digital thermometers are replacing mercury thermometers |
|
Barometers |
Indicates pressure |
|
|
|
Medical, Scientific Instruments |
Temperature and pressure measuring devices |
Products w/Hg must be labeled, including disposal
restrictions |
MN |
|
|
Dental Equipment and Supplies |
|
|
|
Dental Equipment/ Supplies |
Forms alloys; chemically binds compounds to form
restorative material |
FDA regulates dental mercury and amalgam alloys separately
as class I and class II devices under Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act |
Federal |
One of nation's largest manufacturers of mercury amalgam
dental fillings will place warnings on amalgam containers shipped to
California and provide warning signs for dental patient waiting rooms
under California's Proposition 65 (Safe Drinking Water and Toxic
Enforcement Act). |
| |
Disposal banned unless mercury reused, recycled or managed
to ensure compliance |
MN |
|
| |
Purchaser must sign agreement of use for medical or dental
uses |
MN |
The Act requires businesses that use or distribute toxics
to label or otherwise notify the public about possible exposure to
chemicals. |
|
Discontinued Uses |
|
|
|
|
|
embalming fluid |
Preservative |
|
|
|
film pack batteries |
|
Use discontinued as of 1988 |
|
|
|
maritime paints |
Antifouling agent |
Registrations suspended in 1972 |
Federal |
|
|
photographic development |
|
|
|
soap |
|
|
|
|
|
wood preservatives |
|
|
|
|
Appendix D:
Examples of State Mercury Controls
Adapted from the Mercury Study Report to Congress Volume
VIII, 1997
|
|
Mercury Sources/targets |
States with Controls |
Control/action |
|
ENVIRONMENTAL SOURCES |
|
General
|
Minnesota |
State has established goals of reducing total mercury
releases, from new and existing sources, into air and water by 60 percent
from 1990 levels by 12/31/2000, and by 70 percent from 1990 levels by
12/31/2005. |
|
Vermont |
State has established an advisory committee on mercury
pollution. |
|
Air Point Sources
|
Florida |
Mercury emission standard for municipal solid waste
incinerators (65 micrograms/m3). |
|
Maine |
An air
emission source may not emit mercury in excess of 100 pounds per year
after January 1, 2000, and 50 pounds per year after January 1, 2004. |
|
Minnesota |
Proposed waste combustion rules include emission limits. |
| New
incinerator permits with mercury limits will require air monitoring
systems and periodic stack testing. |
|
New Jersey |
Mercury emission standard for municipal solid waste
incinerators (65 micrograms/m3), with further reductions to be phased in. |
|
Ohio |
Considering installing mercury-emission control equipment. |
|
Wisconsin |
State will prepare and adopt minimum standards for mercury
air emissions. |
|
Medical waste incinerators with capacity greater than 5
tons per day must be tested for mercury during the first 90 day period of
operation and once the following year. |
|
Water Point Sources
|
Maine |
After January 1, 2000
mercury dischargers in water from industrial facilities must be less than
1 pound per year, and after January 1, 2002 must be less than 0.1 pound
per year. |
| Department
of Environmental Protection has proposed, "Chapter 519, Interim
Effluent Limitation and Controls for the Discharge of Mercury" under
38 MRSA Section 420 and Chapter 500, Public Laws of 1999. This rule
will require discharge sources to implement pollution prevention plans
following models prepared by the Department, and may require progress
reports. Dischargers of municipal wastes, industrial process wastes
and other similar sources will be subject to testing requirements and
interim effluents for mercury. Based on these tests the Department
will establish both average and daily maximum limits. |
|
Michigan |
Businesses must report use and discharge information for
mercury under the Water Pollution Control Act. |
|
Wisconsin |
State will adopt maximum discharge limits on mercury and
mercury compounds. |
|
Hg-Containing Wastes
|
Florida |
It is illegal for small quantity generators (SQGs) to
knowingly place batteries or products containing a mercuric oxide
electrode into their solid waste stream. Also, manufacturers and
distributors of mercuric oxide batteries are required to implement a
take-back program for these batteries and products with non-removable
batteries, without regard to brand. |
|
The incineration of, or landfill disposal of
mercury-containing devices and spent lamps is prohibited. |
|
Requires local governments to implement source separation
programs at solid waste facilities to remove mercury containing devices. |
|
Minnesota |
Management standards for facilities recycling mercury-
containing hazardous wastes (currently being drafted). |
|
Mercury must be removed from products before disposal. |
|
New Hampshire |
Established a committee to study mercury source reduction
and recycling issues. |
|
Vermont |
Labeled mercury-added consumer products must be separated
and disposed of in authorized facilities.
All solid waste districts and municipalities must
implement public information and mercury-collection programs. |
|
State prohibits landfill disposal of labeled mercury-added
consumer products. |
|
Wisconsin |
State requires testing and reporting of mercury emissions
by operators of Medical Waste Incinerators. |
|
Mercury Sources/targets |
States with Controls |
Control/action |
|
PRODUCTS |
|
White Goods |
Illinois |
Mercury components must be removed from discarded white
goods before disposal. |
|
Minnesota |
Products containing mercury must be labeled, and the
labels must include any disposal restrictions. |
|
Mercury components must be removed prior to disposal. |
|
The distribution of mercury- containing fever thermometers
is restricted. |
|
Manufacturers must provide information and incentives
regarding recycling or proper management. |
|
HVAC dealers are required to properly manage or recycle
used mercury thermostats. |
|
Mercury in repaired or replaced items must be recycled. |
|
Batteries
|
Arkansas |
Ban on the manufacture of alkaline batteries containing
any mercury effective 1- 1- 96. |
|
Ban on the manufacture of mercury- containing zinc carbon
and mercury button cell batteries effective 1- 1- 94. |
|
State issued regulations defining collection procedures
and responsibilities of the manufacturer and user of mercury batteries
effective 1- 1- 94. |
|
California |
Required manufacturer to reduce the level of mercury to
0.025% by weight in alkaline batteries effective 1- 1- 94, and ban on the
manufacture of alkaline batteries containing any mercury effective 1-
1-96. |
|
Ban on the manufacture of mercury- containing zinc carbon
and mercury button cell batteries effective 1- 1- 94. |
|
Connecticut |
Required manufacturer to reduce the level of mercury to
0.025% by weight in alkaline batteries effective 1- 1- 92. |
|
Ban on the manufacture of mercury- containing zinc carbon
batteries effective 1- 1- 93. |
|
Collection of mercury button cell batteries required by
retailer effective 1- 1- 92. |
|
State issued regulations defining responsibilities of
manufacturer, supplier and user effective 1- 1- 92. |
|
Florida |
Ban on the sale of alkaline batteries containing mercury
greater than 0.025% by weight effective 7- 1- 95, and ban on the retail
sale of alkaline and zinc carbon batteries containing any mercury
effective 1- 1- 96. |
|
Ban on the sale of mercury button cell batteries effective
10- 1- 93. |
|
State issued regulations defining collection procedures
and responsibilities of the manufacturer and user of mercury batteries
effective 1- 1- 94. |
|
Ban on the sale of mercury containing batteries if
manufacturer fails to meet collection procedures and other
responsibilities effective 1- 1- 94. |
|
Illinois |
Task force to study storage, transport, disposal and
recycling. |
|
Iowa |
Ban on the sale of alkaline batteries containing mercury
greater than 0.025% by weight effective 7- 1- 93, and ban on the retail
sale of alkaline batteries containing any mercury effective 1- 1- 96. |
|
State issued regulations defining responsibilities of
manufacturer, supplier and user effective 7- 1- 96. |
|
Ban on the sale of mercury- containing batteries
(including button cells) if manufacturer fails to meet collection
procedures and other responsibilities effective 7- 1- 96. |
|
Collection of mercury button cell batteries required by
retailer effective 7- 1- 96. |
|
Maine |
Ban on the sale of alkaline batteries containing mercury
greater than 0.025% by weight effective 1- 1- 94, and ban on the
manufacture of alkaline batteries containing any mercury effective 1- 1-
96. |
|
Ban on the sale of mercury containing zinc carbon
batteries and mercury button cell batteries effective 1- 1- 93. |
|
State issued regulations defining collection procedures
and responsibilities of the manufacturer and user of mercury batteries
effective 1- 1- 94. |
|
Maryland |
Collection of mercury button cell batteries required by
retailer effective 7- 1- 94. |
|
Ban on the sale of mercury button cell batteries if
manufacturer fails to meet collection, transportation, disposal and
consumer education responsibilities effective 7- 1- 94. |
|
General ban on the sale of mercury containing batteries
effective 7- 1- 94, but state authorized to grant exemptions if certain
requirements are met. |
|
State issued regulations defining responsibilities of
manufacturer, supplier and user effective 7- 1- 94. |
|
Massachusetts |
Ban on the retail sale of mercury- containing alkaline
batteries effective 1- 1- 95 is pending. |
|
State regulations defining collection procedures and
responsibilities of the manufacturer and user of mercury batteries are
pending. |
|
Ban on the sale of mercury button cell batteries is
pending. |
|
Michigan |
A new battery law signed on June 29, 1995. |
|
This law bans the sale of alkaline batteries containing
mercury (with the exception of alkaline manganese button cells containing
less than 25 mg of mercury) and zinc carbon batteries containing mercury
beginning January 1, 1996. |
|
The sale of mercuric oxide batteries (with the exception
of button cells) are also banned for sale after January 1, 1996, unless
the manufacturer identifies a collection site for recycling, informs users
of the locations and informs the purchasers of a telephone number that can
be called to get information about returning mercuric oxide batteries for
recycling or proper disposal. |
|
Minnesota |
Required manufacturer to sell alkaline batteries
containing no more than 0.025% mercury by weight effective 2- 1- 92, and
has banned manufacturer sale of alkaline batteries containing any mercury
effective 1- 1- 96. |
|
General ban on the sale of mercury- containing batteries
effective 2- 1- 92, but state authorized to grant exemptions if certain
requirements are met. |
|
Mercury batteries may not contain more than 25 mg of
mercury unless an exemption is granted. |
|
Sale of dry cell batteries with mercuric oxide and
electrode batteries prohibited without exemption. |
|
Ban on mercury button cell batteries effective 2- 1- 92. |
|
Manufacturers must set up collection, transport, recycling
and consumer education programs. |
|
New Hampshire |
Required manufacturer to reduce the level of mercury in
alkaline batteries to 0.025% by weight effective 1- 1- 93, and has banned
the manufacturer sale of alkaline batteries containing any mercury
effective 1- 1- 96. |
|
Ban on the manufacture of mercury- containing zinc carbon
batteries effective 1- 1- 93. |
|
State issued regulations defining collection procedures
and responsibilities of the manufacturer and user of mercury batteries
effective 1- 1- 93. |
|
State issued regulations regarding the collection of
mercury button cell batteries effective 1- 1- 93. |
|
New Jersey |
Required manufacturer to reduce the level of mercury to
0.025% by weight in alkaline batteries effective 1- 1- 92, and ban on the
manufacture of alkaline batteries containing any mercury effective 1-
1-96. |
|
Ban on the manufacture of mercury- containing zinc carbon
batteries effective 1- 1- 92. |
|
Ban on mercury button cell batteries effective 1- 1- 94. |
|
State issued regulations defining collection procedures
and responsibilities of the manufacturer and user of mercury batteries
effective 1- 20- 93. |
|
Sale of mercury batteries banned if manufacturer fails to
meet collection and other responsibilities effective 1- 20- 93. |
|
New York |
Required manufacturer to reduce the level of mercury to
0.025% by weight in alkaline batteries effective 1- 1- 92. |
|
Ban on the manufacture of mercury- containing zinc carbon
batteries effective 1- 1- 93. |
|
Mercury oxide battery ban pending. |
|
Oregon |
Required manufacturer to reduce the level of mercury to
0.025% by weight in alkaline batteries effective 1- 1- 92. |
|
Rhode Island |
Required manufacturer to reduce the level of mercury to
0.025% by weight in alkaline batteries effective 1- 1- 92. |
|
State issued regulations defining collection procedures
and responsibilities of the manufacturer and user of mercury batteries
effective 1- 1- 94. |
|
Ban on mercury button cell batteries effective 1- 1- 93. |
|
Vermont |
Required manufacturer to reduce the level of mercury in
alkaline batteries by 0.025% by weight effective 2- 1- 92, and ban on the
retail sale of alkaline batteries containing any mercury effective 1- 1-
96. |
|
Ban on mercury button cell batteries effective 1- 1- 93. |
|
State issued regulations defining collection procedures
and responsibilities of the manufacturer and user of mercury batteries
effective 1- 1- 93. |
|
Batteries sold to the public containing mercury must be
labeled, other than button batteries. |
|
Wisconsin |
Ban on the manufacture of mercury- containing alkaline
batteries effective 1- 1- 96, and ban on the manufacture of mercury-
containing zinc carbon batteries effective 7- 1- 94. |
|
State issued regulations defining collection procedures
and responsibilities of the manufacturer and user of mercury batteries
effective 7- 1- 94. |
|
Ban on the manufacture of mercury- containing batteries if
manufacturer fails to meet collection procedures and other
responsibilities effective 7- 1- 94. |
|
Mercury Sources/targets |
States with Controls |
Control/action |
|
Electrical Components |
Minnesota |
Switches, electric relays, or other electrical devices
individually or as part of another product, that contain mercury, must be
labeled, and the labels must include any disposal restrictions. |
|
Pennsylvania |
Mercury use in mining equipment (i.e., electrical
machinery) is limited. |
|
Vermont |
Requires labeling of switches, electric relays, or other
electrical devices individually or as part of another product, that
contain mercury. |
|
Paints and Pigments |
Minnesota |
No mercury can be deliberately introduced into products
intended for use in Minnesota, except for art supplies. |
|
Medical and Dental Uses
|
Minnesota |
Disposal of dental equipment and supplies containing
mercury is banned, unless the mercury is reused, recycled, or managed to
ensure compliance. |
|
Purchaser must sign an agreement of use for medical or
dental uses. |
|
Ban on the use of mercury manometers. |
|
New Jersey
New Hampshire |
Prohibits sale or use of embalming fluids containing
mercury. |
|
Vermont |
Products containing mercury must be labeled. |
|
Toys
|
Michigan |
No sale of toys containing mercury (pending). |
|
Minnesota |
Toys with mercury are banned and fines are imposed on
retail sales of toys containing mercury. |
|
Wisconsin |
|
|
Laboratory Uses |
Michigan |
Mercury will be banned in school labs by the year 2000. |
|
Lighting
|
Florida |
Ban on incineration of lamps. Crushing, landfilling and
recycling of lamps allowed with appropriate controls (proposed). |
|
Florida also will control management of residual mercury
from recycling operations. |
|
Minnesota |
Fluorescent lamps and high intensity lamps sold to
managers of industrial, commercial, office, or multi-unit buildings must
be labeled and building contractors must specify mercury management plans
for removed lamps. |
|
Lamps in state- owned buildings must be recycled. |
|
Mercury must be removed from mercury vapor lights before
disposal and lamp sellers and contractors must provide public education
about mercury management requirements. |
|
The production and distribution of mercury vapor lights
are limited. |
|
New York |
Mercury vapor lights must be self- extinguishing or have
protective shield. |
|
Ohio |
Lamps are viewed as by- products that can be recycled, and
exempt from RCRA. |
|
Vermont |
Lamps containing mercury must be labeled. |
|
Poisons |
Ohio |
The sale of mercury and mercury compounds is restricted. |
|
Pennsylvania |
Levels established for mercury products considered to be
safe. |
|
Packaging |
Florida |
State bans the sale of, and restricts the use of packaging
and packaging components containing mercury. |
|
New Jersey |
|
|
Illinois
Minnesota
New York
Wisconsin |
Restrictions on mercury content in packaging are being
phased in. (Dates and concentrations vary by state). |
|
Pharmaceuticals |
Michigan |
Labeling of livestock remedies containing mercury is
required. |
|
Illinois
Indiana
New York
Ohio
Pennsylvania |
Manufacturers must list the quantity of mercury in
products. |
|
Explosives/Fireworks
|
Michigan |
The sale or use of fireworks containing mercury is
prohibited. |
|
New Jersey |
|
|
Minnesota |
Explosives containing mercury are Class A maximum hazards. |
|
Wisconsin |
Permits required for fireworks with mercury (Minnesota
only). |
|
Thermostats and Thermometers
|
Minnesota |
Manufacturers of thermostats containing mercury must
label such items and provide incentives for, and information to,
purchasers and consumers to ensure the mercury disposal is properly
managed. Otherwise, the manufacturer is liable for improper disposal of
such thermostats by purchasers and consumers. |
|
Medical facilities may not routinely distribute
thermometers containing mercury. |
|
Vermont |
Products containing mercury must be labeled. |
|
Automobiles |
Minnesota |
Crushing of automobiles is prohibited unless a good faith
effort has been made to remove all mercury switches. |
|
Appendix E:
Federal Mercury Controls
Adapted from OECD, 1995
|
|
Specific Sources/focus |
Control/action |
|
ENVIRONMENTAL MEDIA |
|
Drinking Water |
Maximum contaminant level (MCL) = 0.002 mg/ L (40 CFR
141.62, 21 CFR 103.35). |
|
Surface Water |
Ambient Water Quality Criteria; water and organisms =
0.012 μg/
L (40 CFR 401, 403, Appendix B). |
|
Water Quality Guidance for the Great Lakes System: aquatic
life = 1.44 μg/
L (acute) and 0.77 μg/
L (chronic);
human health = 0.0018 μg/
L; wildlife = 0.0013 μg/
L (40 CFR 132). |
|
Air |
No ambient air standard. |
|
Soil |
No soil standard. |
|
ENVIRONMENTAL SOURCES |
|
Air Point Sources |
Emissions from mercury ore processing facilities and
mercury cell chlor- alkali plants are limited to a maximum of 2,300 g/ 24
hours (40 CFR 61.01).
Emissions from sludge incineration plants, sludge drying
plants, or a combination of these that process wastewater treatment plant
sludges are limited to a maximum of 3,200 g/ 24 hours (40 CFR 61.52).
Industrial sources emitting mercury and mercury compounds
may be subject to Maximum Achievable Control Technology (MACT) standards
for major stationary sources and Generally Available Control Technology (GACT)
standards for area sourcesb.
Emission guidelines on mercury emissions from municipal
waste combustors under ''
111 and 129 of the 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments.
Regulations on mercury emissions from medical waste
incinerators under ''
111 and 129 of the 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments were promulgated on
August 15, 1997.
Airborne emissions of mercury on and other substances from
the burning of hazardous waste in boilers and industrial furnaces,
including cement kilns, are regulated under the Resource Conservation and
Recovery Act (40 CFR 266). |
|
Water Point Sources |
Effluents from industrial facilities and municipal
wastewater treatment facilities are regulated through industry- specific
pretreatment standards and effluent guidelines for existing and new
sources of pollution and are based on the limits of theavailable control
technology (40 CFR 401, 403, Appendix B).
Groundwater at hazardous waste treatment, storage and
disposal facilities must be monitored for the presence of mercury (40 CFR
302.4, 264.94). |
|
Sewage Sludge |
Permissible levels of mercury in municipal wastewater
treatment sludges: 17 mg/ kg dry wt. and cumulative load of 17 kg/ hectare
for agricultural land; 17 mg/ kg dry wt. and annual load of 0.85 kg/
hectare for home garden or lawn; 57 mg/ kg dry wt. for other land
applications; and 100 kg/ hectare for surface disposal (CWA). |
|
Mercury-Containing Wastes |
Any solid waste (including soil that is being disposed) is
considered a hazardous substance and prohibited from disposal in RCRA
Subtitle D (non- hazardous) landfills if its leachate contains 0.2 mg/ L
mercury or greater (40 CFR 261.24); land disposal in RCRA Subtitle C
(hazardous) landfills is allowed only after prescribed treatment to reduce
mercury in extract to 0.2 mg/ L (40 CFR 268).
Certain wastes are listed as hazardous due, at least in
part, to the presence of mercury (e. g., K071 = brine purification muds
from the mercury cell process in chlorine production, and K106 =
wastewater treatment sludge from the mercury cell process in chlorine
production).
The amount of mercury in a number of hazardous wastewaters
(e. g., F039, K071, K106, P065, P092) must be treated down to specified
levels to meet the land disposal restrictions. |
|
Any Environmental Release |
Any release of 1 pound or more of mercury into the
environment in a 24- hour period (the reportable quantity) must be
reported immediately to the National Response Center if the release is not
federally permitted (40 CFR 302).
Certain facilities that release more than a reportable
quantity of mercury must immediately report the release to state and local
entities.
Any release or transfer of mercury by facilities that
exceed use or manufacturing thresholds is reportable under the Toxic
Release Inventory. |
|
Foodstuffs or Feed |
Action level for methylmercury in fish, shellfish and
other aquatic animals = 1 ppm (FDA CPG 7180.07).
The import of foods containing the residue of mercury-
containing pesticides that are not registered for use in the U. S. is
prohibited. |
|
Specific Sources/focus |
Control/action |
|
PRODUCTS |
|
Batteries |
By early 1991, all U. S. manufacturers converted
production so that the mercury content of batteries, except in button and
coincells, did not exceed 0.025% by weight.
Federal legislation pending concerning the manufacture of
only "non- mercury" formula batteries of all types by 1- 1- 97.
Federal ban on mercury button cell batteries pending as of
1- 1- 95.
Federal legislation permitting only the manufacture of
"no mercury" formula zinc carbon batteries pending as of 1- 1-
95. |
|
Paints and Pigments |
All uses of mercury in paints have been discontinued. |
|
Dental Uses |
Dental mercury is classified as a Class I medical device,
with extensive safety regulations on its use. Dental amalgam alloy is
classified as a Class II device, subject to additional special controls.
U. S. Public Health Service has recently studied risks
from mercury amalgams and recommended tighter controls on dental uses of
mercury and further research to reach more definitive conclusions on risk. |
|
Lighting |
Because many fluorescent lamps are classified as RCRA
hazardous wastes under current test procedures, U. S. EPA is evaluating
options for lamp disposal. Major options are 1) conditional exclusion of
lamps from hazardous waste management requirements, and 2) handling lamps
in a special collection system for other "low grade" and small
quantity hazardous wastes (such as batteries and household pesticides). |
|
Pesticides |
No current production of mercury- containing pesticides;
all former registrations have been cancelled or requests for voluntary
cancellation have been received. |
|
Special Paper Coatings |
The only two companies that manufacture these products
have announced that plans are being developed to phase out the use of
mercury in the coatings.
It is predicted that mercury will be eliminated entirely
from this application by 1995. |
|
Pharmaceuticals |
Removal or restriction of mercury in "over- the-
counter" (OTC) drugs such as anorectal products and topical
antiseptics.
Request for additional data on other OTC mercury antimicrobials. |
|
Cosmetics |
The use of mercury as a preservative or antimicrobial is
limited to eye- area cosmetics or ointments in concentrations less than
60ppm (21 CFR 700.13). |
|
OTHER STANDARDS AND PROGRAMS |
|
Occupational Standards |
OSHA Standards: ceiling limit of 0.1 mg/m3 for
inorganic and elemental mercury, 0.01 mg/m3 as an 8- hr time
weighted average for alkylmercury compounds, and a ceiling limit of 0.04
mg/m3 for alkylmercury compounds.
All forms of mercury are assigned a skin notation,
indicating that the substance is absorbed through the skin and therefore
skin contact should be avoided.
As an OSHA hazardous chemical, the presence of mercury at
a facility requires submittal of a Material Safety Data Sheet. |
|
Transportation Standards |
Designated as hazardous substances by the Department of
Transportation and subject to requirements for packaging, shipping and
transportation (40 CFR 172.101). |
|
Virtual Elimination Project |
U. S. EPA and other mercury stakeholders are looking
holistically at mercury sources and policies to identify and promote
"cleaner, cheaper, smarter" ways of reducing mercury levels in
the Great Lakes region.
Efforts are designed to (1) reduce uses at the source
through pollution prevention measures, (2) reduce releases through
treatment or other management techniques and (3) clean up sites of past
contamination. |
|
Appendix F:
Voluntary Initiatives
This table is adapted from U.S. Status Report on
Mercury, 1999
|
|
Title |
Description |
|
A. Federal Voluntary
Partnerships and Initiatives |
|
|
Three northwest Indiana steel
mills, Bethlehem Steel Burns Harbor, Ispat Inland Inc. Indiana Harbor
Works, and U.S. Steel Gary Works, signed a voluntary agreement with the
Lake Michigan Forum, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), and the
Indiana Department of Environmental Management (IDEM), on September 15,
1998, to reduce the use of mercury at their facilities. The mills intend
to develop a clean sweep/pollution prevention initiative to inventory,
recycle, and substitute to the greatest extent practicable mercury at
their facilities. |
|
|
EPA and the American Hospital
Association (AHA) signed a memorandum of understanding, on June 25, 1998,
committing them to work together to significantly cut hospital wastes by
2005. The agreement envisions the virtual elimination of
mercury-containing hospital wastes and a one-third reduction in total
hospital wastes by 2005. EPA and AHA intend to co-sponsor a series of
national waste management seminars for hospitals. The agreement also
covers: obtaining and reviewing industry information on pollution
prevention efforts; developing model plans for cutting chemical wastes;
and investigating pollution prevention opportunities for ethylene oxide
and persistent, bioaccumulative, and toxic pollutants. |
|
|
EPA Region 5 recently awarded a
matching funds grant to the Ecology Center of Ann Arbor, to promote
pollution prevention (P2) in the health care industry in partnership with
the Michigan Hospital Association. The project will focus on mercury
reduction in SE Michigan. The award was made through the Environmental
Justice P2 Grant program competition. |
|
|
The Chlorine Institute has
provided to USEPA its first annual report detailing the chlor-alkali
industry's progress towards meeting a voluntary commitment to reducing
mercury use 50 percent by 2005. The report includes descriptions of
activities undertaken to help identify reduction opportunities, and also
provides data on preliminary reductions achieved in 1996 and 1997. The
Chlorine Institute's report can be viewed at: http://www.epa.gov/bns/bnsmerc.html |
|
|
Olin Corp. has set a goal to
eliminate discharges of mercury used to produce chlorine and caustic soda
at its two chlor-alkali plants. The company will be involved in a research
program designed to answer uncertainties about the quantity of mercury
released from these plants. The research will be conducted by the
Department of Energy's Oak Ridge National Laboratory, and the Universities
of Tennessee and Michigan, and will be funded by Olin Corp., and EPA. |
|
|
EPA=s Green Lights
Program is a voluntary initiative with state and local governments, and
industry, that encourages use of high efficiency light fixtures and use of
appropriate disposal/ recycling for mercury containing lamps. |
|
Title |
Description |
|
B. State Voluntary Partnerships
and Initiatives |
|
|
Wisconsin Department of
Natural Resources provided information encouraging mercury reduction to
state hospitals and clinics in 1998. A booklet, AMercury-Free: What=s In
It for Me@, was included with the annual medical waste report that
hospitals must complete for the state. This outreach effort was the result
of interaction and cooperation between two different bureaus within DNR.
While hospitals are not required to report on mercury reduction efforts
underway, two chose to do so. |
|
|
Wisconsin Department of
National Resources is partnering with electric utilities through the
Thermostat Recycling Corporation (TRC), community clean sweeps, household
hazardous waste collection facilities, and other means to promote
recycling and replacement of mercury-switch thermostats. Two of the
state=s six major utilities have included promotional materials with
customer bills and/or on their web sites. TRC reports that, since November
1997, 932 thermostats have been collected; 69 recycling bins have been
issued; and 9.7 pounds of mercury have been reclaimed. |
|
|
Beginning in the Fall of 1998,
the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, the University of
Wisconsin, and the University of Wisconsin Extension Program began
replacing mercury-containing manometers to Wisconsin farmers in the Great
Lakes basin. This program is funded by a grant from the U.S. EPA Great
Lakes National Program Office and is patterned after a similar program in
Minnesota. |
|
|
Indiana=s Department of
Environmental Management (IDEM) Mercury Awareness Program is a state and
local partnership dedicated to investigating and identifying commercial
uses of mercury, researching potential pollution prevention options, and
developing and implementing outreach strategies for significant sources.
In October 1998, IDEM initiated a statewide effort to collect and recycle
household items containing mercury. The effort will be led by the Regional
Household Hazardous Waste Task Force, a consortium of 35 southern Indiana
solid waste management districts, and will involve other solid waste
management districts and communities. |
|
|
Michigan=s Mercury
Pollution Prevention (M2P2) Task Force was convened in August 1994 and,
since that time has been active in numerous mercury pollution prevention
efforts across Michigan. A few of the Task Force=s efforts include:
M2P2 Task Force=s
Automobile Subgroup identified 23 uses of mercury in automobiles; and
Outreach materials describing
mercury threats and disposal options have been distributed to science
teachers.
|
|
|
In order to evaluate
progress towards the zero discharge goal in the Lake Superior basin,
baseline information is needed on indicators of releases of nine
designated chemicals. The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) is
working on two projects to 1) establish a baseline for five mercury
indicators and 2) encourage the use of low mercury feedstock chemicals,
such as caustic soda. MPCA is also working with a group of Minnesota
stakeholders in the development of a comprehensive mercury reduction
strategy. The stakeholders are involved through an advisory council that
will provide recommendations to the state government on mercury reduction
options. Teams of staff and stakeholders are working on reduction
strategies and the criteria by which to rank them. The agency will use the
council=s advice as one source of information when considering a mercury
reduction initiative. The MPCA may develop regulations or recommend
legislation as a result. |
|
Title |
Description |
|
C. Community-based Voluntary
Initiatives |
|
WLSSD Undertakes Amalgam
Recycling Initiative |
Western Lake Superior Sanitary
District (WLSSD) in cooperation with the Northeast District Dental Society
has developed recycling procedures for materials containing amalgam
particles. Amalgam contains mercury which, if disposed of in solid or
medical waste or rinsed to the sewer, could be released to the
environment. The first annual amalgam recycling report showed that
approximately 522 pounds of waste material containing amalgam was
collected for recycling. Eighty eight percent of dental practices
responded to the survey conducted by the WLSSD. The Minnesota Dental
Association also supports amalgam recycling. |
|
WLSSD Mercury Zero Discharge
Pilot Project |
Western Lake Superior Sanitary
District (WLSSD), the largest wastewater treatment facility discharging to
the Lake Superior watershed, is supporting the goal of zero discharge of
persistent bioaccumulative toxics by developing a multimedia mercury zero
discharge pilot project with hospitals, clinics, educational institutions,
laboratories, and dental practices. WLSSD hopes this program will not only
test the theory that prevention at the source is more cost-effective than
end-of-pipe treatment, but will also ultimately result in the virtual
elimination of mercury discharges from these specific business types. In
some instances reduced discharge through recycling, on-site treatment, or
better management practices may be an interim goal. The specific
activities will include documentation of the sources of mercury for the
specific business types. |
|
Blueprint for Mercury
Elimination |
With support from the Great
Lakes Protection Fund, the Western Lake Superior Sanitary District (WLSSD)
has conducted a Mercury Zero Discharge Project to identify and eliminate
sources of mercury to its wastewater treatment plant. The results of the
project have been compiled in a Blueprint for Mercury Elimination,
designed for use by other wastewater treatment plants in developing and
implementing their own mercury reduction programs. It includes information
on sources of mercury, successful reduction strategies and case studies,
and suggestions for implementing a program. As a result of this project,
WLSSD initiated or strengthened pollution prevention partnerships with
industries, educational facilities, hospitals, and dentists in its service
area and demonstrated that significant mercury reductions in municipal
wastewater discharges can be achieved through cooperative partnerships
with industry, public education, and disposal facilities.
To date, the Blueprint for
Mercury Elimination has been disseminated to over 800 wastewater treatment
plants throughout the Great Lake States and Canada. In addition, over 1200
Blueprints have been sent to pretreatment coordinators, government units,
environmental agencies and other interested parties throughout the Great
Lake States, Canada, and the rest of the United States. The work begun
under the Mercury Zero Discharge Project continues with support from the
U.S. EPA Great Lakes National Program Office. |
|
Wisconsin Communities Initiate
Mercury Reduction Projects |
Mercury releases to municipal
sanitary sewer systems by hospitals, dental offices, schools,
universities, laboratories, other facilities, and homes are largely
unregulated. The Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources is working with
seven communities to develop and implement mercury reduction programs
targeted to these diverse wastewater sources. The programs are designed to
educate the population about the impacts of and alternatives to mercury
use, collect mercury and mercury products, and provide information about
and/or coordinate transporting the mercury to a contractor for recycling. |
|
Pennsylvania Department of
Environmental Protection P3ERIE Program |
P3ERIE is a voluntary pollution
prevention program composed of DEP, businesses, civic organizations, and
educational institutions in the greater Erie community. Their mission is
"to build support for pollution prevention by developing and
implementing a public education campaign and practical projects to reduce
the amount of mercury and other persistent toxins that are used and
released to the environment in the greater Erie community, especially the
Lake Erie watershed." To date, P3ERIE has accomplished the following:
-
collected 1,245 pounds of
elemental mercury during a 1998 Earth Day event;
-
distributed 9,000 brochures
regarding mercury pollution prevention;
-
worked to encourage
northwest Pennsylvania's largest hospital, Hamot Medical Center, to
become mercury-free;
-
conducted energy efficiency
workshops at the Northwest Pennsylvania Manufacturer's Association;
and
-
implemented an active
pollution prevention program for school laboratories.
|
|
Detroit Water and Sewerage
Department (DWSD) PCB/Mercury Minimization Program |
Consistent with its ongoing
efforts to work with its customers to pilot pollution prevention programs,
the DWSD has undertaken a number of special programs to effectively
control mercury in hospitals, dental practices, industrial laundries,
laboratories, and households. DWSD has initiated an Atmospheric Deposition
Study, made revisions to its Local Limits Ordinance, and established an
Education/Outreach Program for the general public. The program helps
identify current uses of mercury, identify and encourage use of
mercury-free alternatives, explore ways to reduce mercury use, coordinate
and/or encourage proper disposal practices, and evaluate the effectiveness
of voluntary activities to date. In one project under this program, the
DWSD developed and coordinated a six-month Bulk Mercury Collection Program
in cooperation with the Michigan Dental Association, the National Wildlife
Federation, the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality, and the U.S.
EPA. More than 400 dentists took advantage of the pro |
|
Mercury Reduction Project for
the Greater Milwaukee Area |
This project is a joint effort
of the Pollution Prevention Partnership, Milwaukee Metropolitan Sewerage
District, and Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources. The project has
already produced a Mercury Source Sector Assessment Report to help
identify important "source sectors," to set priorities for
developing cooperative mercury education, technical assistance, and
collection programs, and to develop an effective mercury reduction
program. |
|
Title |
Description |
|
D. Industrial/commercial
Voluntary Initiatives |
|
Electric Utility Industry |
The amount of coal used by
non-utility industry is being reduced through the further electrification
of industry throughout the country. Efficient electrical use opportunities
are matched and marketed to non-utility coal users to replace coal
processes. For example, many efficient electric arc furnaces have replaced
basic oxygen furnaces in steel manufacture. The industry estimates that a
reduction of more than 15 tons of emitted mercury for commercial and
industrial boilers has already resulted. |
|
DTE Energy/Detroit Edison
Just-in-Time Arrangements |
In response to a 1997 request by
the state to reduce storage and eliminate the need for mercury instruments
that could be replaced cost-effectively with non-mercury instruments,
Detroit Edison, Michigan's largest electric utility, employed just-in-time
arrangements for instrumentation and mercury with a supplier. The project
will end in December 1998. One ton less mercury is now stored at Detroit
Edison facilities. |
|
Consumers Energy Company
Undertakes Mercury P2 Initiative |
Consumers Energy Company, a
Michigan electrical and gas energy and energy services company, began a
Mercury Pollution Prevention Initiative in 1996. Mercury is contained in
coal used in fuel and is used in plant equipment. The company took action
to identify its mercury sources, estimate the total quantity of mercury
use, review existing disposal practices, and investigate future management
options and costs. The program has heightened awareness of mercury
concerns in the company and presented options for use of non-mercury
containing equipment. It has also reduced the use of equipment containing
mercury and associated stock inventory. In 1996, the program recorded a
231 pound reduction of elemental liquid mercury; in 1997, an additional
reduction of 171 pounds was reported. |
|
Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation |
Niagara Mohawk Power
Corporation, an investor-owned electric and gas utility providing energy
to 1.5 million residential, commercial and industrial customers, is
committed to the virtual elimination of the use of mercury in its service
territory and has established a goal of replacing all mercury containing
gas regulators. Since 1995, the company reportedly has committed
considerable resources to the elimination of mercury in its systems. The
company reports that it has reduced the number of mercury containing gas
regulators from approximately 37,500 to approximately 600. The company
also reports that it has achieved the U.S. BNS Challenge for Level I
substances and that these results surpass the 50 percent reduction target
of the Binational Toxics Strategy in the deliberate use of mercury. |
|
Mercury and PCBs: American
Electric Power |
Since 1987, AEP has voluntarily
removed PCBs from its transmission and distribution equipment, including
about 4,000 PCB-filled and mineral oil-filled transformers, 15,000 PCB
substation capacitors, and 860 other PCB items. AEP's Project Good Turn
encourages customers in Ohio, Indiana, and Michigan to turn in second,
older working refrigerators and freezers for recycling CFCs and scrap
metal, incinerating PCB capacitors, and safe disposal of mercury. AEP
reports that it has already recycled more than 40,000 units containing a
total of more than 1,000 pounds of PCBs and 80 pounds of mercury. |
|
Battery Industry |
In 1984 and 1985, the battery
industry accounted for approximately 55% of the total United States
consumption of mercury, according to the U.S. Bureau of Mines.
Industry-wide initiatives have been taken to decrease the presence of
mercury in batteries and battery related mercury contributions to
municipal solid waste. New technologies have been introduced which control
gassing (which can lead to leakage and possible ruptures) in batteries
without the use of mercury. These technologies include: (1) removing or
decreasing impurities which cause gassing; (2) using other formulations to
suppress gasses and; (3) redesigning the batteries to allow gases to
escape at faster rates.
Mercury batteries, which use
mercuric oxide as an electrode material, have been replaced by
alternatives, such as zinc air batteries, except for a few non-household
specialty uses. When alternatives are not available, battery manufacturers
provide information so that the battery user can send the used batteries
to a properly licensed collection site for recycling or proper disposal.
As a result of these
initiatives, the battery industry reports that the United States battery
industry's 1994 consumption of mercury was 99.41% less than its 1984
consumption rate (29,700 flasks in 1984, one flask = 76 pounds, to 174
flasks in 1994.) During this same time period, annual sales of alkaline
batteries in the United States increased 150%. |
|
Thermostat Recycling Corporation
Initiative |
In December 1997, the Thermostat
Recycling Corporation (TRC) launched a program to recycle mercury-switch
thermostats in nine states, including Indiana, Michigan, Minnesota, Ohio,
and Wisconsin. The TRC is a private corporation established by thermostat
manufacturers, Honeywell, General Electric, and White-Rodgers. Under the
program, heating and cooling contractors can drop off old mercury-switch
thermostats at participating wholesalers. The wholesalers will collect the
thermostats in protective bins provided by TRC and send them to TRC's
recycling center where the switches will be removed and forwarded to a
mercury recycler. TRC reports that it has processed 50 pounds of mercury
in the program's first six months. |
|
Lighting Industry Pushes for
Design and Manufacturing Advances |
The lighting industry has made
significant investments in manufacturing process and new lamp designs to
continue to drive down mercury content in lamps. These investments have
reportedly reduced the average mercury content of a four foot lamp from
48.2 mg in 1985 to 22.8 mg in 1994. The lamp industry expects to drive
mercury content below 12 mg/lamp by the year 2000. |
|
Mercury and PCBs: Consumers
Energy Company Launches Replacement Lighting Program |
In 1996, Consumers Energy
Company launched the "Bottom Line Solutions" replacement
lighting program for commercial and industrial customers. The program
allows customers to increase their business' lighting while reducing
operating and future disposal costs. The new fixtures have efficient,
low-mercury lights and non-PCB ballasts. |
|
Mercury and Hexachlorobenzene:
The Dow Chemical Company |
In support of the Binational
Toxics Strategy, The Dow Chemical Company has set a goal for the company
to reduce air and water emissions of hexachlorobenzene and mercury
compounds by 75 percent by 2005. |
|
Bell Atlantic Mercury Collection
Project |
Bell Atlantic, a provider of
telecommunication services, has instituted a project to collect all
mercury relays and switches from old telecommunication equipment. The
effort is ongoing with no expected end date. The collected electrical
devices are sent to a mercury smelter that safely separates the mercury
from the metal casings. On an annual basis, Bell Atlantic collects more
than 50,000 pounds of switches and relays containing mercury. |
|
Automobile Pollution Prevention
Project |
Chrysler Corporation, Ford Motor
Company, General Motors Corporation, and the American Automobile
Manufacturers Association joined forces in 1991 to form the US Automotive
Pollution Prevention Project (or, Auto Project). The project began as a
partnership, with the U.S. EPA (Great Lakes National Program Office)
funding the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) to launch
the project. Now, the auto industry itself is leading the project and
making great progress in reducing pollution at the source.
The focus of the project is a
group of "Great Lakes Persistent Toxic Substances" (GLPTSs),
including Mercury and PCBs. After the first four years, the project has
expanded from a concentration on the Great Lakes to a national effort. A
similar effort was launched in Canada in 1992.
An integral part of this ongoing
effort is the 70 pollution prevention case studies (not all of which
pertain to BNS substances) that have been developed by the auto companies.
The case studies are available at: http://www.deq.state.mi.us/ead/p2sect/auto/
The American Automobile
Manufacturers Association will track emissions of both Binational Toxic
Strategy Level I and Level II substances through the U.S. Auto Pollution
Prevention Project. EPA Region 5 remains strongly involved through the
Auto Project Advisory Group (APAG) which also includes representatives
from trade associations, higher education, technology centers, public
interest groups, a foundation, and state governments. |
|
General Motors Corporation |
Using environmentally conscious
design and manufacturing principles, General Motors Midsize & Luxury
Car Group (MLCG) facilities replaced mercury switches with ball-type
switches used in underhood lamp activation in their 1998 Cadillac and
Buick models. The company reports that this change resulted in an
estimated elimination of 1,500 pounds of mercury a year from underhood
switches. It has been estimated that the mercury contained in underhood
and trunk lamp switches accounts for 87% of mercury usage in automotive
applications. This amounts to 12.2 million mercury switches containing a
total of 8.5 metric tons of mercury per year. MLCG has already eliminated
all mercury switches in the trunk lamp activation and replaced these with
trunk-ajar switches. |
|
Chrysler Corporation |
Chrysler Corporation instituted
a project to modify product specifications to: eliminate mercury from
equipment; decommission mercury-containing equipment; and evaluate the
alternative for blood pressure measurement equipment. The project has
resulted in mercury being removed from 20 engineering equipment
specifications. The company reports that 1000 pounds of decommissioned
mercury were collected in the first year. Mercury-free alternatives to
sphygmomanometers were also identified. |
|
Chrysler Corporation |
Chrysler has participated in
discussions with the Michigan Mercury Pollution Prevention Task Force
about mercury use within its facilities and products. The company had
discovered in 1995 that mercury is used in underhood switches of certain
current models. Chrysler has worked with the American Automobile
Association to develop a common approach to identify and remove the
mercury switches. |
|
Ford Motor Company |
Ford Motor Company reports that
it has worked since 1995 to identify feasible alternatives for all mercury
switches in all models worldwide and to introduce mercury-free designs in
all identified applications as soon as practicable. |
|
Title |
Description |
|
E. Special Interest Initiatives |
|
Mercury Information Sheet |
Greenpeace Native Lands Campaign
and the Indigenous Environmental Network collaborate on several
environmental issues. Together, they have produced an information sheet on
mercury contamination, its sources and effects. |
|
Community Mercury Reduction
Project |
As part of the Lake Superior
Alliance Sustainable Basin Project, the Central Upper Peninsula Sierra
Club was awarded a grant to develop a Community Mercury Reduction Project.
Through this grant, the Marquette Community Mercury Reduction Task Force
was formed. The Task Force developed recommendations related to: sampling;
public education; outreach; ordinances; small businesses; and its own
continued efforts. In June 1998, the Marquette Area Wastewater Treatment
Facility submitted a grant to EPA Region 5 requesting support to implement
the Task Force's efforts to achieve a regional mercury mass balance,
continue education and outreach, and implement community mercury reduction
activities. The project is designed to be transferrable to other
communities in the Great Lakes . |
|
Binational Strategy, Generally:
National Wildlife Federation |
The National Wildlife Federation
(NWF) has promoted the reduction and virtual elimination of Binational
Toxics Strategy substances for several years. NWF utilizes a broad range
of activities and tools such as hosting workshops, convening special task
forces, distributing action alerts and publishing reports and articles on
timely topics to educate the public regarding important water quality
issues. NWF is working with EPA and state officials to promote the
establishment of total maximum daily loads (TMDL) for mercury in regional
watersheds. |
Appendix G: Bibliography
Ayres, R. J. 1997. Journal of Industrial
Ecology, 1, 1, 81-94
Engstrom, Daniel R., and Edward B. Swain,
1997. ARecent
Declines in Atmospheric Mercury Deposition in the Upper Midwest,@
Environmental Science and Technology 31, No.4, 960-967.
Federal Register, May 28, 1999. Volume 64,
Number 103.
Florida Department of Environmental
Protection, 1999 Solid Waste Management Annual Report, August 1999,
Chapter 5. http://www.dep.state.fl.us/dwm/documents/swm/swm_99/default.htm
Gilkeson, John, Minnesota Pollution Control
Agency, 1996. Mercury Products Study: A report to the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency - Region V.
Jasinski, Stephen M., 1994. The Materials
Flow of Mercury in the United States. United States Bureau of Mines
Information Circular 9412.
Kearney, AT, 1997. Mercury Treatment and
Storage Options Summary Report. Report for U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency Region 5.
Lindberg, SE, and J Price, 1999. Measurements
of the airborne emissions of mercury from municipal landfill operations: AA
short-term study in Florida.@
Journal of Air and Waste Management Association, 49.
Lindberg, SE, et al, 1999. Pathways of
Mercury in Solid Waste Disposal, ORNL Sampling Operations Summary and
Preliminary Data Report for PaMSWaD-I, Brevard County Landfill. Oak
Ridge National Laboratory, Report to the Florida Department of Environmental
Protection.
Michigan Mercury Pollution Prevention Task
Force, 1996. Mercury Pollution Prevention in Michigan. Michigan
Department of Environmental Quality.
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, 1999.
Report on the Mercury Contamination Reduction Initiative Advisory Council=s
Results and Recommendations. March 1999. http://www.pca.state.mn.us/hot/legislature/reports/mercury.pdf
North American Task Force on Mercury, 1997. North
American Regional Action Plan on Mercury.
SRI International, 1996
Swedish National Chemicals Inspectorate (KEMI),
1997. Mercury in Products - a source of transboundary pollutant
transport. November 1997.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1989. Best
Demonstrated Available Technology (BDAT) Background Document for Mercury
Wastes.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1992. Characterization
of Products Containing Mercury in the Municipal Solid Waste Stream in the
United States, 1970-2000. #530S92013. April, 1992.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1997a. Mercury
Study Report to Congress: White Paper. Office of Air and Radiation. http://www.epa.gov/airprogm/oar/merwhite.html
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1997b. 1997
National Listing of Fish Consumption Advisories.
http://www.epa.gov/ost/fishadvice/
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1999. 1990
Emissions Inventory of Forty Potential Section 112(k) Pollutants. Final
Report. Emissions, Monitoring and Analysis Division, and Emission
Standards Division, Research Triangle Park.
United States Geological Survey, 1998. Minerals
Yearbook
http://minerals.usgs.gov/minerals/pubs/commodity/mercury/430497.pdf
United States Geological Survey, 1999. Mineral
Commodity Summary
http://minerals.usgs.gov/minerals/pubs/commodity/mercury/430399.pdf
Appendix H:
Mercury Waste RCRA Categories
Source: Federal Register, May 28, 1999 (Volume 64, Number
103, pages 28949-28963)
D009
Wastes--Characteristic Mercury Wastes.
D009 wastes are extremely variable in composition, and depend on the
industry and process that generate the waste. Some of the more common types
of D009 wastes include miscellaneous wastes from chlor-alkali production
facilities (especially cell room trench sludge and activated carbon for
liquid or gas purification), used fluorescent lamps, batteries, switches,
and thermometers. D009 wastes are also generated in the production of
organomercury compounds for fungicide/bactericide and pharmaceutical uses,
and during organic chemicals manufacturing where mercuric chloride catalyst
is used.(1)
Mercury concentrations
within D009 wastes may range from 0.20 mg/L TCLP [toxicity characteristic
leachate procedure] to greater than 75 percent of the total waste
composition. D009 wastes may also contain organic compounds, usually when
mixed with solvent wastes.
Although
characterization data for D009 wastes are limited, some conclusions can be
made regarding potential treatment concerns. Wastes with greater than 500
ppm 40 CFR part 261, appendix VIII organics (such as benzene) may be
problematic for commercial retorting facilities due to the permitting
requirements for boiler and industrial furnaces (BIF) (40 CFR 266.100(c)).
At least two facilities are unable to handle wastes with these levels of
volatile organics due to the additional permitting that would be required.
However, these two facilities are capable of treating non-volatile activated
carbons.
K071
Wastes--Brine purification muds from the mercury cell process in chlorine
production, where separately prepurified brine is not used.
K071 wastes are generated by the chlor-alkali industry in the mercury cell
process. In this process, sodium chloride is dissolved to form a saturated
brine solution. The brine solution is purified by precipitation, using
hydroxides, carbonates, or sulfates. The precipitate is dewatered to form
K071 wastes, while the purified brine continues in the process. The depleted
solution from the mercury cell is ultimately recycled to the initial step of
the process.
Available analytical
information for K071 brine purification muds show that these wastes consist
primarily of inorganic solids and water. The normal total mercury content of
K071 wastes is less than 100 parts per million (ppm) and is normally
characterized as metallic mercury or soluble mercuric chloride.(2) Mercury from
K071 wastes is typically recovered using a wet process, reflecting the BDAT
for this waste.
K106
Wastes--Wastewater treatment sludge from the mercury cell process in
chlorine production.
Like K071 wastes, K106 wastes are generated from chlorine production using
the mercury cell process. Effluent from the mercury cell includes spent
brine, a portion of which is recycled and a portion of which is purged to
wastewater treatment. Other plant area wastewaters (e.g., stormwater,
washdown waters) are also typically sent to this treatment system. The
wastewater treatment process generates a sludge through precipitation and
filtering, which is K106 waste. Sulfides (as either sodium sulfide, Na2S,
and/or sodium bisulfide, NaHS) have been commonly used as a precipitation
agent for at least the last 10 years (1988 to 1998), according to data from
the Chlorine Institute. Sludges generated in this manner are comprised, in
part, of mercuric sulfide. Other (minor) precipitation agents result in the
formation of mercury hydroxide or in elemental mercury. However, sulfide
precipitation is preferable to hydroxide precipitation using hydrazine
because mercury hydroxide is susceptible to matrix dissolution over a wide
range of pH under oxidizing conditions.
Available analytical
information for K106 wastes indicates they are primarily composed of water
and diatomaceous earth filter aid. This is true for K106 wastes generated by
both sulfide treatment and hydrazine treatment. K106 wastes from sulfide
precipitation contain approximately 4.4 percent mercury, as mercuric
sulfide, while K106 wastes from hydrazine treatment contain approximately
0.5 percent mercury, as mercurous hydroxide.(3)
The mercury
concentration in K106 waste is consistently greater than 260 mg/kg and
therefore retorting is a required technology for this waste. K106 waste also
contains significant levels of sulfides sulfates, sodium chloride, and
organics, although the mercury is likely in an elemental or a sulfide form.
P065
Wastes--Mercury fulminate.
P065 wastes consist of discarded mercury fulminate product,
off-specification mercury fulminate product, and container or spill residues
thereof. No waste characterization data were available for P065 listed
wastes. The quantity of P065 waste is expected to have declined, as the
military has phased out its use in explosives.(4)
P092 Wastes--Phenylmercury
acetate.
P092 wastes consist of discarded phenylmercury acetate product,
off-specification phenylmercury acetate product, and container or spill
residues thereof. There are very little data available on the composition of
P092 listed wastes. The primary constituent of P092 listed wastes is
phenylmercury acetate; organic constituents (in particular, benzene) are
also expected to be present.(5)
The use of phenylmercury acetate as a
preservative in latex paint was phased out in 1991. Thus, the quantity of
P092 waste is expected to decline dramatically as the stock of
mercury-bearing paint is depleted.(6)
U151
Wastes--Mercury.
U151 wastes consist of discarded elemental mercury product,
off-specification metallic mercury product, and container or spill residues
thereof. The majority of U151 wastes reported as a single waste code (i.e.,
not mixed with other listed or characteristic wastes) in the EPA 1986
Generator Survey are over 50 percent mercury. The principal constituent of
U151 is metallic mercury.(7)
FOOTNOTES:
(1)
US EPA, 1989, pages 2-8
(2)
US EPA, 1989, pages 2-11
(3)
US EPA, 1989, pages 2-11
(4)
Kearney, 1997, page 1
(5)
US EPA, 1989, pages 2-17
(6)
Kearney, 1997, page 1
(7)
US EPA, 1989, pages 2-17
|