|
Environmental
Decalogue |
![[LINE]](linea.gif) |
|
The 10
environmental commandments of STMicroelectronics
Our vision
for environmental responsibility and sustainable
development
At STMicroelectronics we believe firmly that it is mandatory for a
TQM driven corporation to be at the forefront of ecological commitment,
not only for ethical and social reasons, but also for financial return,
and the ability to attract the most responsible and performant
people. Our "ecological vision"is to
become a corporation that closely approaches environmentsl neutrality. To
that end we will not only meet all environmental requirements of those
communities in which we operate but, in addition, we will strive to comply
to the following ten commandments:
|
| 1
Regulations |
|
1.1 Meet the most stringent environmental
regulations of any country in which we operate, at all of our locations.
1.2 Comply with all international protocols
at least one year ahead of official deadlines at all our locations.
|
| 2
Conservation |
2.1 Energy - Reduce total energy
consumption(Kwh per k$*) by at least 5% per year, through process and
facilities optimization, conservation and building design.
2.2 Water consumption - continue to reduce
water draw-down (cubic meters per k$*) by at least 5% per year, through
conservation, process optimization and recycling.
2.3 Water recycling - reach a minimum of 90%
recycling ratio in 2 pilot sites by end 2005.
2.4 Trees - reduce office and manufacturing
paper consumption (kg per employee) by at least 10% per year, and use at
least 95% recycled paper, or paper produced from environmentally
certified forests.
|
| 3
Greenhouse Gas Emissions |
3.1 CO2 - reduce total emissions due to our
energy consumption (tons of carbon equivalent per M$*) by at least a
factor of 10 in 2010 versus 1990, which is a goal 5 times better than
the average of the industries meeting the Kyoto Protocol
goal.
3.2 Renewable energies - increase
their utilization (wind, photovoltaics and thermal solar) so that they
represent at least 5% of our total energy supplies by end
20100
3.3 Alternative energies - adopt,
wherever possible, alternative energy sources such as cogeneration and
fuel cells.
3.4 Carbon sequestration -
compensate the remaining CO2 emissions due to our energy consumption
through reforestation or other means aiming at total neutrality towards
the environment by 2010.
3.5
PFC - reduce emissions of PFC (tons of carbon equivalent per M$*) by at
least a factor of 10 in 2008 versus 1995.
|
| 4
Pollution |
4.1 Noise - meet a "noise-to-neighbours"
below 60dB(A) at any point and any time outside our property perimeter
for all sites, or comply with local regulations (whichever the most
restrictive).
4.2
Contaminants - handle, store and dispose of all potential contaminants
and hazardous substances at all sites, in a manner to meet or exceed the
strictest environmental standards of any community in which we
operate.
4.3 ODS - phase out all remaining
Class 1 ODS included also in closed loops of small equipments before end
2001.
|
| 5
Chemicals |
5.1 Reduce the consumption of the 6 most relevant
chemicals by at least 5% per year (tons per M$*), through process
optimization and recycling (baseline 1998).
|
| 6
Waste |
6.1 Landfill - reduce the amount of
landfilled waste below 5% of our total waste by 2005.
6.2 Reuse or recycle at least 80% of our
manufacturing and packing waste by end 1999, and 95% by end
2005.
6.1 Use the "Ladder
Concept" as a guideline for all our actions in waste management.
|
| 7 Products
and Processes |
7.1 Design products for decreased energy consumption
and for enablement of more energy efficient applications.
7.2 Contribute to global environmental control by
establishing a database of Life Cycle Assessment of our
products
7.3 Systematically include the environmental
impact study in our development process.
7.4 Publish and
update information about the chemical content of our products.
|
| 8
Proactivity |
8.1 Support local initiatives for sponsoring
environmental projects at each site in which we operate.
8.2 Sponsor an annual Corporate
Environmental Day, and encourage similar initiatives in each
site.
8.3Encourage our people to
lead/participate in environmental committees, symposia, "watch-dog"
groups etc.
8.4Include an "Environmental
Awareness" training course in the ST Universtity curriculum and offer it
to suppliers and customers.
8.5Strongly encourage our suppliers and
subcontractors to be EMAS validated or ISO 14001 certified, and assist
them through training, support and auditing. At least 80% of our key
suppliers should be certified by end 2001.
|
| 9
Measurement |
9.1 Continuously monitor our progress,
including periodic audits of all our sites worldwide.
9.2Cooperate with international
organizations to define and to implement eco-efficiency
indicators.
9.3Measure progress and
achievements using 1994 as a baseline (where applicable) and publish our
results in our annual Corporate Environmental Report.
|
| 10
Validation |
10.1 Maintain the ISO 14001 certification and EMAS
validation of all our sites worldwide.
10.2 Certify new
sites within 18 months of their operational start-up, including regional
warehouses.

Since 1991, the Company's sites have
received more than 60 awards, of which 24 for Environmental issues such
as:
| 1991 |
Champion: Clean and Beautiful Factory
Competition (Muar, Malaysia) |
| 1993 |
Cornucopia Award: Environmental and Health
Coalition (Rancho Bernardo, California,
USA) |
| 1994 |
Recognition: Malta Ecological Society
(Kirkop, Malta)
Award: Ministry of the Environment
(Toa Payoh, Singapore)
Charter Member: Clean Texas 2000
(Carrollton, Texas, USA) |
| 1995 |
Trophée Hélianthe: Prévention,
Récupération, Valorisation des Déchets (St Genis,
France)
Certificate of Environmental
Responsibility (Carrollton, Texas, USA) |
| 1996 |
Environmental Services Department's Waste
Reduction and Recycling Award (Rancho Bernardo, California,
USA)
Recognition:
Valley Forward Association (Phoenix, Arizona,
USA)
Prize:
Puliamo il mondo - LEGAMBIENTE (Agrate,
Italy) |
| 1997 |
Award:
EPA Ozone Protection (Kirkop, Malta)
Award: French Ministry of Environment
(ST France) |
| 1998 |
Winner: Waste Reduction Award Program
(WRAP); California Environmental Protection Agency Integrated Waste
Management Board (Rancho Bernardo, California,
USA)
Trophy:
Trophée Environmental Entreprise; Categorie Grandes Entreprises by
Enjeux Les Echos and Price Waterhouse Cooper (ST
France) |
![[LINE]](linea.gif)
SYNTHESIS OF
EUROPEAN UNION STRATEGY FOR WASTE MANAGEMENT KNOWN AS "LADDER
CONCEPT"*
| LEVEL OF PREFERABILITY
|
END OF LIFE
TREATMENT |
ECONOMIC IMPACT |
| 1 |
PREVENTION - avoid
waste |
++ Saving at
source |
| 2 |
REUSE again
for original purpose |
+ Replacement
reduction |
| 3 |
RECYCLE for
alternative use |
+ Material
recovery |
| 4 |
COMBUSTION with
energy recovery |
+ Energy
recovery |
| 5 |
INCINERATION
without energy recovery |
- Consumes
energy |
| 6 |
LANDFILL |
--
Contamination |
Top
|